Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Agile PR: The Bearer of Reality



Earlier in my career, I worked with startups dedicated to software quality including Coverity and Agitar. These companies promoted more than their products, they promoted agile software development methodologies.

But it wasn’t until today when listening to Perficient's Kevin Sheen, Managing Director of Global Offshore Services, that I realized how it feels PR has become much more "agile". Especially as PR evolves into social media. 

For those who don’t know, agile software development is a methodology for developing software  code that involves frequent iterations, teamwork, collaboration and transparency. 

Keen said 75% of CIOs want some way to measure their software development performance, but only 33% do it. Among the reasons for not measuring performance: lack of discipline; lack of time/money and the tongue and cheek “we don’t want to be the bearer of reality.”

I suspect a similar disparity exists with PR pros. We all want to develop good metrics, but not everyone takes the time to do it or be thoughtful about what the metrics are.

But what struck me about the chat today is how recent PR launches I’ve done feel quite agile – both in their methodologies and their metrics of success.

Keen listed a few agile methodologies and metrics for success. I’ve taken his categories and added how my own experiences with recent launches apply.

Agile PR Methodologies:

  • High degree of transparency – The social media elements around a launch today take a lot of time; especially if part of your goal is to monitor and engage target communities online in the places they frequent whether that be blogs, LinkedIn, Google Groups or Twitter. If you decide to outsource a lot of this monitoring/response work to an agency, it might require frequent (daily) updates with clients (unless you trust them implicitly to understand your positioning and online voice).
  •  Iterative methodologies – Just as with agile development, the moving parts around PR launches today are much more complicated. You now have to monitor and promote your messages through various channels. Something said on Twitter can change your timeline; your targets or how you approach the launch. You have everything planned out at the beginning, but each day is filled with mini plans. Iterative plans can include specific Tweets, comments to blogs, pitches, content creation (videos, screencasts, press releases, blogs, etc) that can change on the fly.
  • Tracking Changes – Keen calls his overseas project teams nightly and looks at a dashboard monitoring their process. PR doesn’t have slick tools like agile software to track their progress daily by a variety of metrics, but even if the process is manual, you need to be able roll up all the information each day into something understandable and actionable for client. For us, it was daily detailed agendas and a weekly PPT dashboard aimed to help other executives at the startup, not involved in the day to day, quickly understand the status of the launch. Anybody who has worked with me knows I hate busy work, but in this environment, clear communication about the ever changing landscape was a key value that we brought the client.

 

Agile PR Dimensions of Success:

  • Quality – This is the big one and where most good PR agencies are putting a lot of time. How many visits did your launch drive to your clients web site according to Google Analytics? How many of those converted to sales? How many people watched the video? How viral was your messaging on Twitter? How many people downloaded the product?
  • Predictability – In the software development world, predictability is “how close cost estimates come to actuals.” Part of me think this doesn’t apply to PR agencies who work on retainers – the amount of work involved with integrated PR/social media campaigns right now means they are probably doing a lot more work than you are paying for. The model is turned around – no matter how hard your agency works you have to have metrics to evaluate if the results are worth it in the end.

Dangers of Staff Churn

Offshore outsourcing has another similarity to PR agencies – the churn of the teams doing the work. Just as PR agencies can churn 50% of the staff over a year’s time – so do the offshore development teams. One US company got so frustrated by the churn (and the ongoing loss of familiarity to their project) that they literally asked for pictures of each member of the development team.


It's a little simplistic to drill down too far in the new parallels between PR and agile software development - but certainly the parallels exist.

 

 

 

Monday, May 4, 2009

Who is the new SlashDot: TechCrunch, Ars Technica or GigaOM?

Erick Schonfeld at TechCrunch wrote yesterday "Survey Says: PR People Love Our No-Embargo Policy."

I chatted with a few PR pros last night after we read Erick's post. From my informal poll, a more accurate headline might be "Survey Says: TechCrunch is the New Slashdot". The embargo policy is interesting - but we are flexible. TechCrunch can do what it wants - as long as it has the influence it has - PR folks will adjust. 

TechCrunch is the new SlashDot (in its day, a mention on SlashDot caused the "SlashDot Effect"  - where the mentioned web site would slow down or temporarily close due to the increased traffic). The TechCrunch community is very large, active and passionate.

What is more interesting to me about this poll is who is listed after TechCrunch.

The folks in this poll named the top  tech blogs: TechCrunch, GigaOm, Engadget, Gizmodo, VentureBeat, Silicon Valley Insider, Meritalk, ReadWriteWeb, LifeHacker. The top 10 Tech Pub blogs were WSJ, New York Times, CNET, BusinessWeek, ZiffDavis, Wired, CIO, eWeek, NetworkWorld and InformationWeek.

MeriTalk and Silicon Valley Insider in the top 10? GigaOm as number 2? Ars Technica at #10?

This surprised me. So I did some quick research that I wanted to share:
  • I looked at each of blogs web site traffic as reported by Compete.com
  • I looked at the Google Analytics for a few recent launches 
Traffic Comparisons:
For starters, lets use Compete.com to track the number of unique visitors to these blogs in March. Compete.com is notoriously sporadic in its findings. RSS feeds push out content in a way where readers aren't counted. But even with the flaws in using Compete - I think this creates some degree of accurate comparison.




Case Studies
Since Compete.com is arguably inaccurate, let's look at the Google Analytics on 2 recent launches I've seen:

Launch 1
- An Ars Technica article delivered 6x as much traffic as a NY Times blog. 
- The NY Times Bits blog delivered 5x as much traffic as OSStatic (GigaOm) 

Launch 2:
- Ars Technica drove 7x the traffic as GigaOm.
- GigaOm drove 2x the traffic as a corporate Twitter feed.
- A corporate Twitter feed drove 8x the traffic as a TechTarget article.

Conclusion
A top 10 list is different for each announcement, for each client. So I won't do my own top 10 list. But reviewing these poll stats, I do wonder what information the PR industry uses to gauge the most influential blogs.

What are your thoughts and experiences?



Social Media - The Active Listener